Let’s find you top rated criminal and traffic lawyers in
- Read thousands of verified recommendations from actual clients
- See each lawyer's specialisation to find the right one for you

Online Communication Case
The individual engaged in online conversations that were deemed inappropriate with a minor, knowing it was part of a sting operation but continued out of what they describe as poor judgment. The conversations transitioned from one messaging platform to another over three days, resulting in the individual's arrest. Represented by a public defender, the person has chosen to remain silent during police interviews. Authorities have claimed to discover an inappropriate image on the individual's device, though the individual denies ever downloading or requesting such material. Law enforcement and legal advisers are currently determining the subsequent steps, and the individual is concerned about the possibility of imprisonment.
Questions about this case
These answers have been verified by a lawyer in the LEAP network
What are the potential charges I might face given the evidence presented against me?
You might face potential charges under local sexual offences laws, such as "sexual communication with a minor' even without the intention to meet. Additionally, if the image in question is deemed inappropriate, you could also be charged with "possession of indecent images of children.” These are serious allegations, and it is important to consult a solicitor specialized in criminal law to navigate this complex matter.
How can I demonstrate to the court that I had no intention of meeting the minor?
To show a lack of intention to meet, you can present evidence that indicates there were no plans or arrangements for a meeting. Highlight any communications that confirm interactions remained solely online. It may also help to provide character references or evidence that demonstrates a misunderstanding of the minor's age.
What are the possible defences I could use concerning the allegation of possessing an indecent image?
To counter the allegation, key defences might include: 1. Lack of Knowledge: Arguing unawareness of the image's presence. 2. Lack of Control: Showing that control over the content was absent, for instance, through unsolicited downloads. 3. Time of Possession: If the image's possession was accidental or negligible in duration.
What steps can I take to mitigate the severity of any potential penalties or sentences?
You can consider taking various steps to mitigate penalties: 1. Engage a Solicitor: Seek a qualified solicitor with expertise in criminal law. 2. Character References: Gather positive references from reputable individuals. 3. Counselling or Therapy: Attend voluntary sessions to demonstrate personal responsibility. 4. Compliance with Conditions: Strictly adhere to any imposed legal conditions. 5. Mitigation Statement: Prepare a statement for court outlining remorse and steps taken to prevent recurrence.
How does the involvement of multiple officers and their lawyers affect the decision-making process regarding my case?
Involvement of multiple officers and legal representatives indicates a thorough investigation. They may contribute various expertise, leading to a more comprehensive review of evidence and impacts on potential charges.
Criminal and Traffic Lawyers in Capital Cities
- Criminal and Traffic Lawyers in Sydney
- Criminal and Traffic Lawyers in Melbourne
- Criminal and Traffic Lawyers in Brisbane
- Criminal and Traffic Lawyers in Perth
- Criminal and Traffic Lawyers in Adelaide
- Criminal and Traffic Lawyers in Hobart
- Criminal and Traffic Lawyers in Canberra
- Criminal and Traffic Lawyers in Darwin
Criminal and Traffic Lawyers by State
Find trusted lawyers